http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-lesson-in-restraint-what-china-tells-us-about-iran/2012/10/21/cb7a2b10-1a44-11e2-aa6f-3b636fecb829_story.html?wpisrc=nl_opinions

Please read the article above. This op-ed offers some lessons from history (from China during the Johnson era and Vietnam War) that shed some light on policy options for dealing with the threat of a nuclear Iran.  Do you think they are valid historical comparisons?  Why or why not? 

“State Department analysts asserted that China’s belligerent rhetoric belied its strategic caution. China’s leaders, they reasoned, might be tempted to step up support for regional insurgencies, such as the one engulfing South Vietnam, but they would stop short of any reckless action that threatened their own survival and would avoid at all costs a direct clash with the superior U.S. arsenal. Even revolutionaries were susceptible to the logic of deterrence, they argued.”   Do you think this line of argumentation applies to Iran in 2012? 

A few basic Blog rules:
1. Be respectful.
2.  Please type your full name, a creative title, and what text/page numbers your blog entry is responding to on the top line of your comment. This will help us keep track of who is responding to what.
3.  You may write in the first-person, informally. That being said, please write in complete sentences and keep your comments relevant and appropriate.
4. 200 word MINIMUM!




Leave a Reply.